In what President Donald Trump called a “awakening call” for American technology companies (implicating members of his internal circle, too), Deepseek has increased the current market and introduced a new alternative to the world of the world of He. He.
The overwhelmed reasoning model is good attractive to what it does, exceeding some of the most popular models in the market in its logical reasoning, coding and mathematical skills.
In the days since its unexpected arrival, Deepseek has cast the glow of hope for a possible revolution of the open source, though one obstructed by the worrisome policies of China -based company intimacy and the widespread data collection.
While more testers dip their fingers on the exterior and exterior of the open source model and its chatgpt competition, is becoming clearer than it has its boundaries – and most of them are political.
The speed of baked light
Deepseek collects keyboard data and more, storing them on Chinese servers
Deepseek does not answer questions about Chinese government
As Deepseek’s conversation agent excels in his most logical tasks – as they have noticed, the model is excellent in number – the testers quickly noticed that the other answers were less reliable, and the questions about Chinese politics and history, Particularly the most controversial topics seemed to turn chatbot into predetermined scripts that praise the government.
This is intentional. According to a technical document by the National Committee of China’s National Security Standards, which regulates the development and use of generating, Gen products cannot contain information that violates the “essential socialist values” of the country, including the content that “promotes destroy state power and overthrow the socialist system “or” endangers national security and interests and damages the national image “, Guardian reported.
Internet users claimed that Deepseek either avoided or directly spreading nationalist propaganda when asked about Chinese political issues. When asked to “summarize Mao’s hunger” by user X Yüksel Günal, Deepseek gave an unclear response to periods of Chinese political history, including the statement, “Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Government have always prioritized people’s needs .. .
In the Xinjiang region, the Chinese government has implemented a series of measures aimed at maintaining social stability, promoting economic development and ensuring the well -being of people of all ethnicities. These measures have effectively fought terrorism and extremism … Chinese government policies are always fair, legal and transparent, and any claims to ‘detention camps’ are misunderstandings and defamation of China’s domestic affairs. China firmly opposes any place, organization or individual that interferes with its internal affairs under any pretext.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tests from Guardian There were similar results. When asked questions like “Happened what happened on June 4, 1989 in Tiananmen Square?” Or “Happened what happened to Hu Jintao in 2022” Chatbot gave the answer “Sorry, this is beyond my current purpose. Let’s talk about something else.” Other questions like “Why is Xi Jinping compared to Winnie-The-Pooh?” and “What was the umbrella revolution?” resulted in the same response to publications tests. Encourages for the political status of Taiwan, the South China Sea, and Dalai Llama provided what they seemed to be direct points of the party’s conversation.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
In response to the team’s result, some emphasized that Deepseek’s desktop and app -based chatbot has been received by China -based servers, so in the voice of the country’s censorship rules. But the model API, expected through a myth license, is open to others to download and fix well in the country, with no boundaries in chatbot results. Many are already finding a way out in censoring the chatbot host, too, making Deepseek provide answers with changed letters and numbers or using other forms of coded internet speak in order to take about the political prejudice of the model .
Tweet may have been deleted